Showing posts with label USA politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USA politics. Show all posts

Monday, November 5, 2012

8 Reasons Why I hope Americans vote for Mitt Romney







Here are some of the reasons why I hope Mitt Romney wins the USA presidential election:

1. Turnaround leader---Mitt Romney has proven track record as turnaround leader---financially turning around the scandal-ridden and mismanaged 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, USA; turning around Massachusetts economy while governor there; turning around losing corporations. I believe he could turn around the ailing USA economy with decisive and pragmatic reforms.

I believe the world now is economically in a precarious situation with financial crises in Europe and USA, a slowing China economy, a stagnant Japan economy, so we need robust reforms and hopefully a genuine recovery in the USA economy under a Romney presidency.

2. Intellectual brilliance & high intelligence---Romney is an intelligent, well-educated leader with impressive credentials.

He attended Stanford University, then earned a Bachelor of Arts in English degree with highest honors from Brigham Young University and also gave the commencement speech, then earning a joint Juris Doctor and Master of Business Administration from Harvard University's Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School. He graduated with top honors from both Harvard schools---cum laude in the law school and among the top-ranked graduates in the business school.

3. Strong support for small businesses, free enterprise ideals & less taxes---Romney vigorously supports the expansion of small businesses, lesser taxes and promotion of enlightened free enterprise ideals as antidotes to the ailing USA economy, instead of the ideas of increased government spending and higher taxes to stimulate the economy.

I am very wary of excessive government dole-outs and other huge wasteful USA government expenditures to prop up badly-run companies, or too much welfare policies. I am for welfare and social assistance policies, but these should be balanced with encouraging more self-reliance and self-help initiatives too.

4. Solid family values and anti-abortion stance---Romney is a good family man with solid moral values and conservative social policies.

An example: I admire Romney's courageous stand in opposing the legality of abortion on demand. I believe human life begins at conception and that abortion is tantamount to the unforgivable crime of murder. I am horrified at the widespread prevalence of abortions in the millions happening every year in the U.S.







5. Centrist & pragmatic ideology in politics---Mitt Romney is ideologically centrist, not overly liberal or ultra-left in political, social and economic issues. Romney is also not too rightwing, therefore he could help unify the deeply divided American politicians from both the Republican and Democratic parties as he had done so as Massachusetts governor vis-a-vis the Democrats-dominated state legislature then.

USA politics is so toxic now and polarized, the fiscal cliff is also a real danger for America and threatens the stability of our world economy. We need a centrist, pragmatic and non-ideological unifying leader in the U.S. to push drastic, systemic---not cosmetic or feel-good---reforms.

The reason for this centrist nature of Mitt Romney, I believe, is because Romney has been a businessman and therefore more of a pragmatist than an ideologue politico.

Critics have unfairly hit Romney for allegedly changing some of his political stands or policy pronouncements in the past, but I view all that as proofs that Mitt Romney is above all a flexible and pragmatic leader.

As the late great China leader and daring reformist Deng Xiaoping once famously said: "It doesn't matter if a cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice."

6. Potential good friend of Asia, not adversarial because of business & pragmatic mindset---I believe Mitt Romney will be good and fair to Asia. There are many in Asia who are concerned that Romney is too anti-China in his election campaign rhetoric and TV commercials, too anti-Asian exports, or that he might curb or curtail Asian exports to America, etc. I believe Romney is a pragmatist, and he will be like the late U.S. President Richard Nixon.

Remember how Nixon was once the most stridently anti-Communist and also anti-China politician in USA Cold War era before he won power as president? After he went to the White House, it was eventually a pragmatic Nixon who boldly initiated detente with and more diplomatic exchanges with China then still under Chairman Mao Zedong of the leftist Cultural Revolution era. China now vastly different and still modernizing, a pragmatist Romney will make the U.S. an economic partner of China.

Since we in Asia has the world's fastest-growing and most dynamic economies, the pragmatic ex-businessman Mitt Romney will surely reach out to Asia and make the USA our partner for world progress.

Towards South Korea, Japan, Asean and other export-driven economies of our region, I believe Mitt Romney will boost USA ties to Asia based mainly on our economic strengths and strategic importance.


7.  Strong support for Israel & for Middle East Peace---I admire Mitt Romney for his strong support for Israel, that dynamic democracy in the Middle East.

I believe his leadership can lead to lasting peace between Jews and Palestinians as well as other Arab or Muslim peoples of the whole Middle East, because Romney is pragmatist and decisive as a leader.

8. A Successful former businessman ideal for USA's No. 1 Problem of the economy---I have nothing against lawyers becoming leaders, like Barack Obama, but the Number 1 problem of America now is the U.S. economy, so why not try a former top businessman and chief executive officer (CEO) like Mitt Romney in the White House?

This former businessman Mitt Romney knows how to handle money and financial problems more than any other leader in USA politics now. In fact, he himself has built a personal net worth of a quarter of a billion dollars or US$250 million which are now mostly in blind trusts. He has proven track record of success in handling financial and money issues, why not let this talented ex-businessman solve the myriad, systemic and complex problems of the ailing U.S. economy?




Monday, October 29, 2012

Close fight! Obama at 49%, Romney 46% just 9 days before election: Reuters/Ipsos poll




My comments:

It seems the social media and even lots of the more liberal-leaning traditional media in the United States seem to be favoring incumbent U.S. President Barack Obama. However, I believe the still underdog but dogged challenger ex-Governor Mitt Romney is surging and has a fighting chance to pull off a possible upset victory?

This is one of the most exciting presidential elections I have ever!

I'm betting a hundred pizzas that former successful businessman Mitt Romney will win! Wanna bet?

Below is the latest opinion poll in USA indicating it's still too close to call:

 
 
Sun, Oct 28 2012
 
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama has extended his narrow lead over Republican challenger Mitt Romney among likely voters in a race that remains statistically tied nine days before the election, according to a Reuters/Ipsos tracking poll released on Sunday.

Obama has a 49 percent to 46 percent edge over Romney, marking a 1 point increase from Saturday but still within the daily online survey's 4 percentage-point credibility interval for likely voters.

Swings could be possible in the remaining days of the campaign, however. Fifteen percent of registered voters say they could still change their minds and vote for a different candidate.

The precision of Reuters/Ipsos online polls is measured using a credibility interval. In this case, the poll has a credibility interval of plus or minus 4.0 percentage points for likely voters.

(Editing by Alistair Bell and Eric Beech)

Saturday, October 27, 2012

More USA newspapers endorsing Mitt Romney? This report from New York Times. Exciting & close election! Vote Romney

My comments:

I came across this feature in the newspaper New York Times just now, and I'm impressed that this report shows more former supporters of Obama in the 2008 presidential election have now switched their support for businessman and former Governor Mitt Romney.

The reason I personally favor Mitt Romney? I'm concerned about the ailing USA economy and I really believe Romney is much more capable to turn around the economy.




Here's the New York Times feature below:

Newspaper Endorsements From Across the Nation

The presidential endorsements of the nation’s largest papers are starting to trickle in. Not surprisingly, most editorial boards supported the same party in 2012 as they had in 2008. But there were some notable exceptions.
All 2012 Endorsements
Switched Party in 2012

Barack Obama

Sunday, Oct. 28
New Yorker |

The Choice

The choice is clear. The Romney-Ryan ticket represents a constricted and backward-looking vision of America: the privatization of the public good. In contrast, the sort of public investment championed by Obama—and exemplified by both the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the Affordable Care Act—takes to heart the old civil-rights motto “Lifting as we climb.” That effort cannot, by itself, reverse the rise of inequality that has been under way for at least three decades. But we’ve already seen the future that Romney represents, and it doesn’t work. | Read Full Endorsement »
Thursday, Oct. 25
San Francisco Chronicle |

Chronicle Recommends: Re-elect Obama

This is a president who was willing to send Navy SEALs on a daring mission to kill terrorist leader Osama bin Laden and to take a stand for marriage equality. This is a Democrat who will push against the party base for trade agreements and education reform. | Read Full Endorsement »
Thursday, Oct. 25
Miami Herald |

Obama for President

In the end, Mr. Obama’s policies across the board — the environment, social policy, taxes and immigration — offer a more generous vision for America. The issues he has fought for, coupled with the lingering doubts about Mr. Romney’s persona and his true intentions, make this a clear choice. | Read Full Endorsement »
Thursday, Oct. 25
Chicago Tribune |

Our Children's America

Four years ago, when we endorsed Obama’s run for the White House, we said he would act with decisiveness and intellectual rigor. Ironically he has shown those attributes most where Americans might have expected them least. That is, in his handling of an unfamiliar realm: world affairs. | Read Full Endorsement »
Wednesday, Oct. 24
Washington Post |

Four More Years for President Obama

In a second term, working with an opposition that we hope would be chastened by the failure of its scorched-earth campaign against him, he is far more likely than his opponent to succeed. That makes Mr. Obama by far the superior choice. | Read Full Endorsement »
Monday, Oct. 22
Tacoma News Tribune |

With Sobered Expectations, Obama for President

Obama has played a very bad hand well. The maligned Troubled Asset Relief Program, the 2009 stimulus bill and such smaller measures as the Social Security payroll tax cut may well have kept the nation from falling off a cliff. | Read Full Endorsement »
Monday, Oct. 22
La Opinion |

Hay Que Reelegir a Obama

Because of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or "Obamacare," now nine million Latinos have health benefits, who up until the present did not have any type of medical coverage. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 20
Newark Star-Ledger |

Barack Obama: The Star-Ledger Editorial Board's Pick for President

Our hope is that Obama wins decisively and that Republicans respond by moving toward the middle, as Democrats did under Bill Clinton. That may be wishful thinking, but it is the nation’s best hope. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 20
New Haven Register |

President Barack Obama Should Be Re-elected

Despite his shortcomings, Obama will be remembered as the president who achieved near universal health care through private insurance, a goal that has eluded presidents since Harry S. Truman, who first proposed it in 1948. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 20
Los Angeles Times |

Obama for President

Voters face a momentous choice in November between two candidates offering sharply different prescriptions for what ails the country. Obama's recalls the successful formula of the 1990s, when the government raised taxes and slowed spending to close the deficit. The alternative offered by Romney would neglect the country's infrastructure and human resources for the sake of yet another tax cut and a larger defense budget than even the Pentagon is seeking. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 20
Charlotte Observer |

At a Crucial Time, Uninspiring Choices for President

The America he believes in celebrates the common good as well as the individual good. When the economy improves – and it will – the country needs a president with that agenda, with those values. We endorse Barack Obama for another four years. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 20
Arizona Daily Star |

Obama's Agenda Gives Steady Hand to Economic Growth

Principled leadership, consensus and time are required. Obama's accomplishments and positions on health care, higher education, and economic and social issues continue to make him the best choice for the interests at home in Southern Arizona and in our country. | Read Full Endorsement »
Friday, Oct. 19
Cleveland Plain Dealer |

On the Basis of Sound Leadership, Re-elect Obama

Today, we recommend President Obama's re-election. He has led the nation back from the brink of depression. Ohio in particular has benefited from his bold decision to revive the domestic auto industry. Because of his determination to fulfill a decades-old dream of Democrats, 30 million more Americans will soon have health insurance. His Race to the Top initiative seeded many of the education reforms embodied in Cleveland's Transformation Plan. He ended the war in Iraq and refocused the battle to disrupt al-Qaida and its terrorist allies. He ordered the risky attack inside Pakistan that killed Osama bin Laden. | Read Full Endorsement »
Friday, Oct. 19
Akron Beacon Journal |

Obama for President

What is telling about a presidency is its tilt, its direction, spirit and priorities. Thus, to those who argue the president lacks a plan for a second term: Look at the foundation that has been set. He has used the levers of government to bolster the economy, investing in education, innovation and health care, understanding the essential role of the public sector in competitiveness. Those tasks are not complete. They would continue. | Read Full Endorsement »
Thursday, Oct. 18
Tampa Bay Times |

Obama Has Earned Second Term

We wish the economic recovery was more vigorous, and we would like the president to present a sharper vision for a second term. But Obama has capably steered the nation through an incredibly difficult period at home and abroad, often with little help from Congress. The next four years will not be easy for whoever occupies the Oval Office, but Obama has been tested by harsh circumstance and proven himself worthy of a second term. | Read Full Endorsement »
Thursday, Oct. 18
San Antonio Express-News |

Obama has Earned a Second Term

No candidate has all the right policies — that includes Barack Obama. But having weathered the challenges of the last four years, we believe he is in a better position to guide the nation over the next four years — and has earned from voters the privilege to do so. | Read Full Endorsement »
Endorsed John McCain in 2008
Thursday, Oct. 18
Salt Lake Tribune |

Too Many Mitts

In considering which candidate to endorse, The Salt Lake Tribune editorial board had hoped that Romney would exhibit the same talents for organization, pragmatic problem-solving and inspired leadership that he displayed here more than a decade ago. Instead, we have watched him morph into a friend of the far right, then tack toward the center with breathtaking aplomb. Through a pair of presidential debates, Romney’s domestic agenda remains bereft of detail and worthy of mistrust. | Read Full Endorsement »
Thursday, Oct. 18
Denver Post |

Barack Obama for President

This is an election that begs the candidates to demonstrate what they plan to do moving forward. Neither has done enough to lead us to think voters on Nov. 6 aren't, to a certain degree, being asked to make a leap of faith. But Obama's record of accomplishment under trying circumstances and his blueprint for a second term make him the best pick to move the nation forward. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 13
Winston-Salem Journal |

Obama is Best Choice for President

Obama has a keen vision that he has worked hard to achieve, against considerable obstacles and often courageously. But the goal is in sight: An America respected worldwide as much for its prosperity as its defense of liberty and justice. | Read Full Endorsement »
Endorsed John McCain in 2008
Saturday, Oct. 13
Sacramento Bee |

Barack Obama for President

Voters often say they want their elected leaders to keep their promises and, at crucial moments, show real political backbone. President Barack Obama deserves a second term largely because he has delivered on both of these fronts. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 13
Philadelphia Inquirer |

Obama Will Do a Better Job

Like every election with an incumbent, this one is mostly about that person's performance. But that doesn't mean the challenger gets to escape scrutiny. And when you take a close look at Romney, you have to question what is real and what isn't. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 13
Lincoln Journal Star |

Obama Best for Middle Class

Obama has been tested and found equal to the task of being president. We think the country is in better shape than it was four years ago, and we think it will be in even better shape if he wins another term in office. | Read Full Endorsement »
Endorsed John McCain in 2008
Saturday, Oct. 13
Daily Herald |

Re-elect President Obama

For supporters and opponents alike, the Obama Administration has taken too long to pull out of the Great Recession, too long to end two wars, and too long to corral a hidebound U.S. Congress hindered by a never-yield partisanship. At times incremental steps feel workmanlike and uninspired. Nevertheless, from passing Wall Street reforms and rescuing the U.S. auto industry, to ending the war in Iraq and repealing don't-ask-don't-tell, Barack Obama has moved the country forward. | Read Full Endorsement »
Did not offer endorsement in 2008
Saturday, Oct. 13
Charleston Gazette |

Obama: For President

We think Obama is a brilliant statesman who has uplifted America after the debacle of the Bush-Cheney epoch. | Read Full Endorsement »
Thursday, Oct. 11
Flint Journal |

President Barack Obama is the Best Choice

We wish Romney had been willing to show the Mitt Romney that showed up at the first 2012 presidential debate throughout this campaign. We especially appreciated his more moderate demeanor. Romney's strength is his moderate views -- something he needs to spend more time on rather than kowtow to the very loud and extreme segments of his party. | Read Full Endorsement »
Sunday, Oct. 7
San Francisco Examiner |

The San Francisco Examiner Backs Barack Obama for President

A president’s second term is an opportunity to implement his legacy agenda. Nothing we have seen suggests that Barack Obama will be content to rest on his laurels in the next four years. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 6
St. Louis Post-Dispatch |

Obama for President: A Second Term for a Serious Man

Four years ago, in endorsing Democrat Barack Obama for president, we noted his intellect, his temperament and equanimity under pressure. He was unproven, but we found him to be presidential, in all that that word implies. In that, we have not been disappointed. This is a serious man. And now he is a proven leader. He has earned a second term. | Read Full Endorsement »
Thursday, Sept. 27
Seattle Times |

The Times Recommends Barack Obama for President, Again

Obama’s presidency has been disappointing, but he still has promise. Romney would be too much of a gamble. | Read Full Endorsement »

Mitt Romney

Thursday, Oct. 25
South Florida Sun Sentinel |

Sun Sentinel Endorses Mitt Romney for President

The president had enormous opportunity when he took office, with Democrats controlling both houses of Congress. But he failed to focus on Job One: Jobs. | Read Full Endorsement »
Endorsed Barack Obama in 2008
Thursday, Oct. 25
Press-Telegram |

Mitt Romney for President

As president, Romney would not be restrained by foolish consistency. He would be expected to do the right thing no matter where the solutions originate. This is the most precious trait an officeholder can have in this era of corrosive hyperpartisanship. | Read Full Endorsement »
Endorsed Barack Obama in 2008
Wednesday, Oct. 24
New York Post |

For America's Future, The Post Endorses Mitt Romney for President

Scrape it down to bedrock, and Mitt Romney knows that there is but one issue in this campaign: America’s woeful economy, and the demonstrated inability of President Obama to cope with it. | Read Full Endorsement »
Wednesday, Oct. 24
Detroit News |

Editorial: Mitt Romney for President

Hope and change are still what Americans are seeking. This time, Republican challenger and Michigan native Mitt Romney offers the best hope of changing the nation's fate. | Read Full Endorsement »
Tuesday, Oct. 23
Grand Rapids Press |

Mitt Romney's Experience and Leadership Can Rebuild America's Economy

Mitt Romney will never electrify an audience with soaring oratory. He might not stir deep passions. But we believe he brings competence to go with confidence that comes with a record of leadership that our country desperately needs, especially in terms of our economy. | Read Full Endorsement »
Monday, Oct. 22
Boston Herald |

Romney’s The One

This nation desperately needs the kind of leadership on the economy that Mitt Romney can provide — that is based on sound principles of flattening out tax rates so that the overburdened middle class can keep more of what they earn and small businesses can grow, providing a much-needed job boost. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 20
Tampa Tribune |

Mitt Romney for President

President Obama may have good intentions, but he is simply taking the nation in the wrong direction. Seasoned executive Romney would come to office ready to put the country on the course to more freedom and prosperity. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 20
Spokesman-Review |

Editorial: Romney Has Better Shot at Solving Nation’s Crisis

We believe Mitt Romney could bring a fresh approach unburdened by recriminations. He has extensive management and leadership experience, and worked with the opposite party as Massachusetts governor. The nation needs that Romney, not the one who pandered to the tea party wing of the Republican Party to secure the nomination. If elected, he needs to take on that faction with the same resolve he’s shown challenging Obama. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 20
New Hampshire Union Leader |

Why Mitt? Reality Over Fantasy

Obama had four years — half of them with a Democratic majority in Congress — to try his way. Romney offers a better way, a realistic way, to restore American prosperity. We tried the fantasy. It did not work. Now it is time to stop dreaming and start growing again. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 20
Columbus Dispatch |

For President

After nearly four years of economic stagnation, massive unemployment, record-setting debt and government intrusions into the economy that have paralyzed the private sector, the United States needs a new direction. For this reason, The Dispatch urges voters to choose Republican Mitt Romney for president in the Nov. 6 election. | Read Full Endorsement »
Friday, Oct. 19
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review |

Mitt Romney for President

Mitt Romney offers a seasoned, strategic and mature public policy mind so sorely needed in the White House and so necessary to enable our great nation and its people to excel. It’s time to begin restoring America. It’s time to elect Mitt Romney as president of the United States. | Read Full Endorsement »
Friday, Oct. 19
Lowell Sun |

Mitt Romney for President

There is no need to retrench from the ideal of American exceptionalism either at home or on the world stage, says Romney. We are an exceptional people, he says, and we must demand exceptional leadership. In The Sun's view, that's where America has fallen off track these past four years. America trusted a "hope and change" candidate, it didn't work, and we're suffering the consequences. Now we've got a tested leader with a proven track record standing before us - Mitt Romney - and it's his time to inspire Americans to greatness. It's Romney's time to bring us together in a single purpose that embraces fairness, self-reliance, responsibility, rugged individualism, entrepreneurial spirit and unlimited success. | Read Full Endorsement »
Friday, Oct. 19
Fort Worth Star-Telegram |

Mitt Romney: New Leadership for More Economic Growth

The slow U.S. economy and its discouragingly high unemployment overshadow the other important issues in this election. Economic recovery must be spurred to a faster pace, and a change to Romney's leadership would do that. | Read Full Endorsement »
Endorsed Barack Obama in 2008
Friday, Oct. 19
Arizona Republic |

Romney Can Lead Economy Forward

The economy indisputably will benefit, perhaps significantly, from a flatter, fairer system of taxation along the lines proposed by Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan. | Read Full Endorsement »
Thursday, Oct. 18
Reno Gazette-Journal |

Nevada Needs a Change Now; Elect Mitt Romney President

Based on our current fiscal condition, a still-weak economy and a Congress deeply divided along party lines, our next president will continue to face a daunting challenge, one that must be met for the good of the country. Four years later, we find ourselves in need of change yet again. Romney must be the leader to get things moving. | Read Full Endorsement »
Endorsed Barack Obama in 2008
Thursday, Oct. 18
Orlando Sentinel |

Our Pick for President: Romney

Romney is not our ideal candidate for president. We've been turned off by his appeals to social conservatives and immigration extremists. Like most presidential hopefuls, including Obama four years ago, Romney faces a steep learning curve on foreign policy. But the core of Romney's campaign platform, his five-point plan, at least shows he understands that reviving the economy and repairing the government's balance sheet are imperative — now, not four years in the future. | Read Full Endorsement »
Endorsed Barack Obama in 2008
Thursday, Oct. 18
Houston Chronicle |

Romney for President

Our endorsement of Mitt Romney is not unqualified. He must address the perception that he tailors his message to suit any given audience. And his economic plans lack specificity. There's a lot of concern that his tax and budget proposals won't add up without gutting our social safety net. "Trust me" is not good enough. Between now and Nov. 6, Romney needs to go to the blackboard and show us the math. | Read Full Endorsement »
Endorsed Barack Obama in 2008
Wednesday, Oct. 17
Tennessean |

Time for Another Change

The 2012 presidential race is fraught with confusion and failed expectations, so much so that it is surprising that any reasonable voter would feel comfortable pressing the button for either President Barack Obama or Gov. Mitt Romney. What is downright infuriating is that, after four years of an Obama presidency and two years of campaigning and 22 televised debates by Romney, so many questions remain and it is difficult to discern what the next four years would look like with either man in charge. | Read Full Endorsement »
Endorsed Barack Obama in 2008
Monday, Oct. 15
New York Observer |

Romney for President

Over the last few weeks, Mr. Romney has shown that he is a moderate to his core—he is a manager, and a listener, who believes he can restore the balance between the private and public sectors that has been a hallmark of the American economy. | Read Full Endorsement »
Endorsed Barack Obama in 2008
Saturday, Oct. 13
Pueblo Chieftain |

It’s Romney

There has to be a better way, and Mitt Romney is pointing to that way. He has outlined a pro-growth package of initiatives that can get this country humming again. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 13
Macomb Daily |

Romney the Leader America Needs to Create More Jobs

Let’s face it: Romney is more of a businessman than a politician. You can resent his wealth all you want, but he has a proven record as a turnaround artist. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 13
Columbian |

President of the United States: Mitt Romney

Romney lacks Obama's credentials and experience in foreign policy. But he better understands how an economic recovery is powered by an incentivized private sector, not a bloated bureaucracy. | Read Full Endorsement »
Endorsed Barack Obama in 2008
Friday, Oct. 12
Oakland Press |

Romney the Leader America Needs to Create More Jobs

Let’s face it: Romney is more of a businessman than a politician. You can resent his wealth all you want, but he has a proven record as a turnaround artist. | Read Full Endorsement »
Sunday, Oct. 7
Omaha World-Herald |

Economy Needs Mitt Romney

A Romney presidency would bring the fiscal discipline necessary to attack the deficit and lead the economy out of the slowest recovery in the nation's history. He would create a common-sense tax and regulatory environment that incorporates the stability and predictability needed to spark new investment, create jobs and get the economy moving. | Read Full Endorsement »
Saturday, Oct. 6
Las Vegas Review- Journal |

For President: Mitt Romney

Nevadans need a president with a vision and political philosophy capable of restoring ingenuity, competition and excellence to our education and health care systems, of paring back the budget deficit and the explosive growth of our debt, of keeping energy affordable, of bringing back jobs and prosperity not just here, but in every American city with residents who want enough economic security to be able to take a Las Vegas vacation. | Read Full Endorsement »
Monday, Oct. 1
Gazette |

Romney Has the Vision We Need

Though Romney believes in limited government, he rightly supports a strong military to protect freedom and prosperity. He promises to restore military jobs that may be lost in January to sequestration — a process of automatic spending cuts resulting from budgetary gridlock. | Read Full Endorsement »
Did not offer endorsement in 2008

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

AGAIN on 3rd USA presidential debate: Romney looked presidential, Obama looked like a glib lawyer?


My Comments:
This is my second post on the third and last USA presidential debate, again with the same sentiments that yeas Obama on debate points but it was Romney who won crucial political points in wooing the public.

I just want to share this essay in Britain's Telegraph newspaper by Dr. Tim Stanley:

Tim Stanley

Dr Tim Stanley is a historian of the United States. His biography of Pat Buchanan is out now. His personal website is www.timothystanley.co.uk and you can follow him on Twitter @timothy_stanley.

 

Romney won the presidential debate by looking presidential. Obama had a painful case of Biden's smile

The third presidential debate covered foreign policy

Romney won the third presidential debate – and how he did it was encapsulated in a single exchange. The candidates were discussing military spending and Romney had just accused Obama of making harmful cutbacks. The President wheeled out what must have seemed like a great, pre-planned zinger: “I think Governor Romney maybe hasn't spent enough time looking at how our military works. You mentioned the navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets because the nature of our military's changed.” The audience laughed, Obama laughed, I laughed. It was funny.


But here’s why it was also a vote loser. For a start, Twitter immediately lit up with examples of how the US Army does still use horses and bayonets (horses were used during the invasion of Afghanistan). More importantly, this was one example of many in which the President insulted, patronised and mocked his opponent rather than put across a constructive argument. His performance was rude and unpresidential.

Obama seemed to have a touch of the Bidens, wriggling about in his chair, waving his hands dismissively and always – always – smirking in Romney’s direction. By contrast, Romney sucked up the abuse and retained a rigid poker face all night. He looked like a Commander in Chief; Obama looked like a lawyer. Who would you rather vote for?

Aside from the horses and bayonets moment, this was essentially a debate without incident. Part of the fault was the format. It’s interesting to note that Romney won the first debate while standing up and Obama did better in the second when walking around. But when both men were forced to sit for 90 minutes, the energy was inevitably reduced and neither broke through the fourth wall convincingly. Romney had a slight edge because he didn’t use his hands so much: Obama blew his closing statements by developing ultra-energetic conjurer’s hands (“Look at the hands, not at the cards, look at the hands…”)

But the bigger problem was that they agreed on the essentials, which were all about foreign policy. Romney refused to tackle Obama directly on Libya (I shouted at the TV that he should, but he just wouldn’t listen) and Fast and Furious seems to have been forgotten by the GOP. In everything else, Obama has become so homicidally neoconservative and Romney so desperately peaceful that they’ve met in the middle on most issues.

Both would defend Israel in the event of an attack, both want out of Afghanistan in 2014 and neither would let Iran get the bomb. If you want a real debate on foreign policy, you’re just going to have to wait until Rand Paul gets the nomination in 2020.

At times this felt almost as boring as that Gingrich v Huntsman debate that I and about 4 other people watched during the primaries. Romney tried his darnedest to bring everything back to the economy and Obama seemed to say in every answer, “So what we need to do in the Middle East is talk more about how rubbish my opponent is.” It’s almost lucky that Obama isn’t running unopposed in this election because then he’d have nothing to run on at all.

Where a disagreement did exist was on the question of leadership; Romney wants to be proactive and Obama pledges to remain reactive. Nevertheless, both seem committed to nation building overseas – with Obama throwing in the caveat that he’d like to do some nation building at home, too. The real difference was in style.

In his closing statement – after Obama was done making the Ace of Spades disappear – Romney channelled Reagan by looking straight into the camera and asserting his faith in America. It was empty, sugary stuff that will make liberals sick. But it was infinitely preferable to Obama’s constant, nasty attacks. Sometimes in life, the nice guys do win.

We also have to judge this debate as part of the narrative arc of this season. Romney won the first debate by a mile. Because Romney’s win was so decisive, it sparked an image change: Americans started to think of him as presidential material.

That’s why Obama winning the second debate by an inch made little impact – people were watching Romney not to see him land punches but to see how well he could take them. He won the third debate because, by the end of the night, his and Obama’s positions in the narrative arc had switched. Romney now looks like the President and Obama looks like the challenger.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

My Analysis on Disturbing Poll on Young Americans Worried About China and National Debt as U.S. Presidential Election Nears

President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney to Debate Foreign Policy and Security Concerns on October 22 (American time)



My Analysis

My personal comments and analysis:

It is sad to see young people of the world's still No. 1 biggest economy---the United States of America (USA)---to be so pessimistic about their country's future and also so afraid of the success of foreign emerging economies like China which they view as "a threat".

This fear of an economically rising China now is similar to past USA fears of then economically resurgent Japan in the 1970s and 1980s, remember? I believe we need not live in fear, that we should embrace the changes of our world and find opportunities in a more progressive world.

If Asian nations like China and its over 1.3 billion people are poor or suffering socio-political instability, wouldn't that explosive situation be a real threat to USA and world stability? I believe the welcome economic emancipation of the masses of China, Brazil, India, Southeast Asia and other countries augur well for world progress and help guarantee quest for global peace. 

It is my belief that a better economic future for America doesn't depend on the weakness of other countries, but on the internal domestic national reforms the leaders of America can muster the guts and vision to implement in a far-reaching manner. Do not blame others, but ourselves always.

I believe USA economic recovery and future viability depend mainly on the quality of USA education for the youth, the level of new investments in crucial research and development (R & D), the breadth and depth of innovations across the board in USA society and industries, the leaders' ability to help restore old-fashioned values like hard work and thrift for higher national savings in the U.S. (instead of too much personal and government debts at shocking levels), etc. All these real and decisive factors for a better USA economy have nothing to do with China, Brazil, Russia, India, South Korea or Southeast Asia.

I urge the youth of America and the leaders there to think differently: The world is not a zero-sum game where one can only flourish while others must suffer. Gone are the days of colonialization centuries ago when Europe, the U.S. and Japan had to have colonial subject nations for cheap or free labor and for unlimited access to natural resources and markets to sustain rapid growth of their industrializing economies while the so-called Third World nations suffer in poverty.

Despite Britain losing its position as No. 1 empire in the world, London remains a very important world financial center, Britain is still a good respected nation as evidenced by the successly hosting of the 2012 London Olympics and its record third place finish in medals.

Despite the decline of the once glorious Ottomon Empire as a world power and the loss of its colonies, modern-day Turkey is today still a good and respected nation at the forefront of economic progress in that geographical realm between Europe and the Middle East.  

The world has changed with the emancipation of nations and it is still continuously changing. Economic competition is not war. The progress of other nations shouldn't automatically mean the decline or obsolescence of others.

Let us view and build our world with courage and optimism as a win-win place, where all peoples can and should flourish together in an atmosphere of mutual respect and understanding.




Here is the disturbing news below on surveyed perceptions of the worried American youth:

WASHINGTON, DC--(Marketwire - October 22, 2012) - Generation Opportunity, the largest non-profit, non-partisan organization in the United States engaging and mobilizing young Americans (ages 18-29) on the important economic issues facing the nation, released new polling data today as the 2012 American presidential election nears. Presidential candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney will participate in the third and final Presidential Debate October 22nd, focusing on foreign policy and national security issues.

"Young American adults are very concerned about the United States' ability to maintain its role as a global leader in the future if it continues on the same path as the last several years. They believe certain policies advocated in Washington, D.C. have weakened America's national security, especially policies that increase the national debt, decrease American energy production, expand American reliance on foreign energy sources, and escalate America's indebtedness to foreign powers.


They view China as both an economic and military threat to the United States, and they closely watch China's economic policies, military buildup, space exploration, and restrictions on Internet and speech freedoms," said Paul T. Conway, President of Generation Opportunity and former Chief of Staff of the United States Department of Labor under Secretary Elaine L. Chao.

"Young Americans refuse to settle for an American future defined by chronic joblessness, increased national debt, and a diminished role on the world stage. They believe President Obama should lower taxes and regulations on American businesses so that they compete effectively and to avoid American jobs from going overseas to countries like China. They overwhelmingly agree that current policies are taking us backward, not forward, and plan to make their voices heard in the upcoming presidential election."

Since its launch in June of 2011, Generation Opportunity has amassed a following of over four million people on Facebook and is actively organizing young adults across America through grassroots tactics, voter registration, and voter turnout efforts.

Conway also served as an agency Chief of Staff at the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and as the Chief of Staff of the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the agency responsible for the American civil service. While at OPM, Conway was involved in the legislative efforts to establish the Department of Homeland Security. He is a past participant in the Senior Executives in National and International Security program at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

For Generation Opportunity, the polling company, inc./WomanTrend conducted a nationwide online survey of 1,003 American adults ages 18-29 between July 27 and July 31, 2012.

Randomly selected online opt-in panel participants were sent an invitation to the survey via email which included a secure link to the online questionnaire.

Quotas were used to ensure the survey was representative of the larger 18-29 year old nationwide population with regard to race, region, and gender. The data were NOT weighted.

The overall sampling margin of error for the survey is +/-3.1% at a 95% confidence interval, meaning that the data obtained would not differ more than 3.1 percentage points in 95 out of 100 similar samples obtained.

YOUNG AMERICANS ON AMERICAN GLOBAL LEADERSHIP AND CURRENT DIRECTION

         55% of young Americans are not confident that America will still be a global leader in five years if the USA continues along the same path as the last few years.
         Only 36% of young Americans agree with the statement "generally speaking, things in the United States are heading in the right direction."
YOUNG AMERICANS ON TOP AMERICAN NATIONAL SECURITY AND ENERGY ISSUES

         When asked to rank the greatest threats to the national security of the United States, young Americans listed the following reasons: (Randomized List) (Accepted Multiple Responses)
*   59% - The national debt;
*   46% - Energy dependence;
*   43% - Indebtedness to foreign nations;
*   40% - Terrorism;
*   33% - Nuclear capable nations like Iran;
*   3% - Other;
*   7% - Do not know/cannot judge (accepted only this response).
         62% of young Americans would increase production of domestic American energy sources like oil, natural gas, and coal if given the opportunity to set America's fiscal priorities.

YOUNG AMERICANS ON CHINA AS A COMPETITOR AND THREAT

         71% of young Americans are concerned that so many American jobs are going to foreign competitors like China.
         72% of young Americans agree that with more and more companies leaving the USA in favor of locating their business in places like China and even Canada, President Obama should lower the taxes on American businesses to restore and expand jobs in America.
         When asked why they thought American jobs are going to foreign competitors like China, young Americans indicated the following reasons: (Randomized List) (Accepted Multiple Responses)
*   69% - Cheaper wages overseas;
*   41% - High taxes on businesses in the U.S.;
*   30% - Too much regulation on businesses in the U.S.;
*   28% - Lack of opportunities to start and grow businesses in the U.S.;
*   2% - I do not think U.S. jobs are going overseas;
*   6% - Do not know/cannot judge (accepted only this response).
         76% of Millennials view China as a danger: 48% as an economic threat and 28% as both an economic and military threat (the polling company, inc./WomanTrend, April 16 - 22, 2011, +/- 4 percent margin of error).

ABOUT GENERATION OPPORTUNITY

Generation Opportunity is an American non-profit, non-partisan organization that seeks to engage everyone from young adults, to early career professionals, college students, young mothers and fathers, construction workers, current service men and women, veterans, entrepreneurs, and all Americans who find themselves dissatisfied with the status quo and willing to create a better tomorrow.

Generation Opportunity operates on a strategy that combines advanced social media tactics with proven field tactics to reach Americans 18-29.

The organization's social media platforms -- "Being American by GO," "The Constitution by GO," "Gas Prices Are Too Damn High," "Lower Taxes by GO," "Keep Texas Awesome," "Jersey Proud," and "We Like Small Government" on Facebook -- have amassed a total fan base of more than 4 million.